Double‐knockout of ADAMTS‐4 and ADAMTS‐5 in mice results in physiologically normal animals and prevents the progression of osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To phenotypically characterize ADAMTS-4- and ADAMTS-5-double-knockout mice, and to determine the effect of deletion of ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5 on the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) in mice. METHODS: Mice lacking the catalytic domain of ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5 were crossed to generate ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout animals. Twelve-week-old and 1-year-old male and female ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout mice were compared with age- and sex-matched wild-type (WT) mice by evaluating terminal body weights, organ weights, clinical pathology parameters, PIXImus mouse densitometry findings, and macroscopic and microscopic observations. ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout mice were challenged by surgical induction of joint instability to determine the importance of these genes in the progression of OA. Articular and nonarticular cartilage explants from WT and ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout mice were treated with interleukin-1 (IL-1) plus retinoic acid ex vivo, to examine proteoglycan degradation. RESULTS: There were no genotype-related phenotype differences between ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout and WT mice through 1 year of age, with the exception that female ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout mice had a lower mean terminal body weight at the 12-week time point. Eight weeks after surgical induction of joint instability, OA was significantly less severe in ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout mice compared with WT mice. Following stimulation of cartilage explants with IL-1 plus retinoic acid, aggrecanase-mediated degradation in ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout mice was ablated, to a level comparable with that in ADAMTS-5-knockout mice. CONCLUSION: Dual deletion of ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5 generated mice that were phenotypically indistinguishable from WT mice. Deletion of ADAMTS-4/5 provided significant protection against proteoglycan degradation ex vivo and decreased the severity of murine OA. These effects in the ADAMTS-4/5-double-knockout mice were comparable with those observed with deletion of ADAMTS-5 alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".