Complex fasciculations and their origin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Kennedy's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complex fasciculations are common in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Combined fasciculations, defined as a complex fasciculation consisting of two or more components that occur independently but also in combination with another component, also occur in ALS. To test the hypothesis that combined fasciculations originate at the supraspinal level, we analyzed 2681 fasciculation potentials from 17 patients with definite or probable ALS by the El Escorial criteria. Results were compared with 304 fasciculation potentials recorded from 6 patients with Kennedy's disease, in which the upper motoneurons are spared. The mean firing frequency of the fasciculations was 24.4 +/- 25.6 per minute in ALS, significantly higher than the 2.9 +/- 3.4 per minute found in Kennedy's disease (P < 0.0001). In ALS, the mean combination ratio (the number of times that a combined fasciculation occurred divided by the total number of fasciculations) was 4.6 +/- 8.3% (range 0-33). Fourteen of 17 ALS patients had combined fasciculations, but only one combined fasciculation was found in a patient with Kennedy's disease. Combined fasciculations are distinctive in ALS, and we hypothesize that they are triggered by a supraspinal mechanism reflecting dysfunction of descending motor pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".