Janice E. Thompson : le mercenariat comme forme socio-historique de coercition privée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selon les tudes historiques, la premire forme de mercenariat est apparue ds l'Antiquit grecque, mais c'est la Renaissance, entre le XIVme et XVIme sicle, que le phnomne mercenaire a pris une relle ampleur. En effet, cette poque en Italie, des condottieri -de condotta, nom des contrats que ces compagnies de mercenaires signaient -taient employs par les cits italiennes pour se dfendre. Remdiant au dclin de l'organisation militaire fodale, les mercenaires constituaient alors de vritables armes professionnelles permanentes. De nos jours, il est souvent fait tat d'un retour des mercenaires que l'on inscrit gnralement sous l'tiquette quivoque de nouveaux mercenaires . Ce terme de mercenaires semble rducteur lorsque l'on observe les diverses ralits que le phnomne peut englober et l'htrognit du mercenariat au cours des sicles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".