MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063088129 · doi:10.1086/346164

Aroid Seeds from the Middle Eocene Princeton Chert (<i>Keratosperma allenbyense</i>, Araceae): Comparisons with Extant Lasioideae

2003· article· en· W2063088129 on OpenAlexafffund
Selena Y. Smith, Ruth A. Stockey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Plant Sciences · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyAraceaeBotanyExtant taxonIntegumentSubfamilyGenusEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A reinvestigation of more than 200 new specimens of Keratosperma allenbyense Cevallos‐Ferriz et Stockey from the Middle Eocene Princeton chert allows a more detailed comparison with living Araceae and provides evidence for the evolution of the lasioid clade. The anacampylotropous seeds possess a warty seed coat, single dorsal ridge, and two lateral ridges. Idioblasts that may have contained raphides are scattered in the outer integument. The seed has a thin micropylar cover and an epistase, with evidence of mucilage in the space between these two structures. The raphe is embedded in the seed coat and parallels the concave surface of the seed. At the chalazal end of the seed, there is a prominent hypostase and podium. Endosperm tissue with dark contents and monocotyledonary embryo are present, but in most specimens these tissues are replaced by fungal hyphae. Anatomical comparisons with the extant lasioid taxa Cyrtosperma merkusii (Hassk.) Schott and Urospatha sagittifolia (Rudge) Schott were made. A reconstruction of K. allenbyense constructed from serial sections allowed the fossil to be compared with the extant genera of Araceae, subfamily Lasioideae, on the basis of external seed morphology of 22 taxa. Keratosperma appears to be a distinct genus among aroids having many shared characters with extant Lasioideae and represents the oldest known member of the lasioid clade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Plant SciencesSame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207