Abundant expression of interleukin-21 receptor in follicular lymphoma cells is associated with more aggressive disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recombinant interleukin-21 (IL-21) has potential utility in cancer therapy. Stimulation with IL-21 can induce apoptosis in follicular lymphoma (FL) cells, and existing studies have suggested that IL-21 signaling may function in tumor suppression. In order to elucidate the relationship between IL-21 receptor (IL-21R) expression and clinical and pathological features in FL, IL-21R was quantified in 114 pretreatment biopsy samples using either conventional immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence microscopy and automated quantitative analysis (AQUA). Reduced expression of IL-21R was associated with favorable overall survival (p = 0.048). AQUA analysis showed an association with the presence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the biopsy sample (p = 0.03), and expression of IL-21R was up-regulated upon transformation of FL to DLBCL in two cases. Our results based on the largest survey to date raise the possibility that IL-21 signaling in FL cells, rather than being tumor suppressive, supports tumor progression and that therapeutic benefit could be realized by blocking IL-21R instead of stimulating it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".