MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of <scp>H</scp>urricane <scp>D</scp>ean (2007) on Game Species of the <scp>S</scp>elva <scp>M</scp>aya, <scp>M</scp>exico

2011· article· en· W2063209177 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Jesús Ramírez-Barajas, Gerald A. Islebe, Sophie Calmé

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotropica · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbundance (ecology)FrugivoreRelative species abundanceBiologyHabitatGeneralist and specialist speciesEcologyOmnivoreAnimal scienceZoologyPredation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We assessed the effects of a high‐intensity hurricane on the abundance of nine game species in the Y ucatan P eninsula, M exico. We sampled 370 km of linear transects in the 3 yr before the hurricane ( i.e ., 2003–2005), and 315 km in 3 yr after the hurricane (2008–2010). Relative track abundances of all species declined by two‐thirds of their prehurricane values. Abundances of C entral A merican agouti D asyprocta punctata , white‐tailed deer O docoileus virginianus , paca C uniculus paca , and G reat C urassow C rax rubra declined significantly after the hurricane swept the area. Relative track abundances showed a negative, but nonsignificant trend for O cellated T urkey M eleagris ocellata , white‐nosed coati N asua narica , brocket deer M azama sp., and collared peccary P ecari tajacu . Only nine‐banded armadillo D asypus novemcinctus showed a significant increase in abundance. Strictly frugivore and habitat specialist species were more affected than omnivores and habitat generalist species. These latter characteristics, or their combination, seemed advantageous to withstand the stress of habitat disturbance. The trend of posthurricane recovery was incipient for affected species, and it was significant for five species after the impact. Overall, most frugivores and habitat specialists did not reach their prehurricane relative track abundances, and G reat C urassow showed no recovery trend. The future expectation of increased frequency and intensity of hurricanes might have severe effects on such species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotropicaSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207