MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063340907 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v1n2p71

Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Putative BnHEC3 Gene in Oilseed Rape (Brassica Napus)

2009· article· en· W2063340907 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoli Tan, Lili Zhang, Zongwei Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsBrassicaOpen reading frameComplementary DNABiologyGeneArabidopsisArabidopsis thalianaGeneticsCloning (programming)In silicoRapid amplification of cDNA endsCoding regionMolecular cloningGenomeHomologous chromosomeMolecular biologyPeptide sequenceBotanyMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HECATE3 (HEC3) is an important transcription factor involved in regulating the carpel and transmitting tractdevelopment in Arabidopsis thaliana. The homologous gene of HEC3 in Brassica napus (designed as BnHEC3) wasobtained by in silico cloning and rapid amplification of cDNA end (RACE) method. BnHEC3 obtained from cDNA is of748 bp, containing an open reading frame (ORF) of 546bp and coding a peptide of 181 amino acid residues. Sequencealignment revealed that BnHEC3 is highly homologous to HEC3 in Arabidopsis thaliana, especially in bHLH region,which is sharing nearly 100% identity, and the polygenetic analysis indicated that BnHEC3 belongs to atypical bHLHprotein family. RT-PCR results showed that BnHEC3 is mainly expressed in young leave. Southern blotting analysisindicated that BnHEC3 has at least three copies in Brassica napus genome. The transient expression of BnHEC3-sGFPin onion epidermic cells showed that BnHEC3 localized in nuclei. These features implied that BnHEC3 functions asHEC3, and may be involved in the development of female reproductive tissues in Brassica napus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiologySame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207