The need for affiliation: An examination of university students' loyalty toward MLB teams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the effect of auditory training on the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) known to localize tonotopically to the region of primary auditory cortex (A1). The stimulus procedure was designed to minimize competitive interactions among frequency representations in A1 and delivered target events at random times in a training window, to increase the likelihood that neuroplastic changes could be detected. Experiment 1 found that repeated exposure to this stimulus advanced the phase of the ASSR (shortened the time delay between the 40-Hz response and stimulus waveforms). The phase advance appeared at the outset of the second of two sessions separated by 24-72 h, did not require active training, and was not accompanied by changes in ASSR amplitude over this time interval. Experiment 2 applied training for 10 sessions to reveal further advances in ASSR phase and also an increase in ASSR amplitude, but the amplitude effect lagged that on phase and did not correlate with perceptual performance while the phase advance did. A control group trained for a single session showed a phase advance but no amplitude enhancement when tested 6 weeks later (retention). In both experiments attention to auditory signals increased ASSR amplitude but had no effect on ASSR phase. Our results reveal a persistent form of neural plasticity expressed in the phase of ASSRs generated from the region of A1, which occurs either in A1 or in subcortical nuclei projecting to this region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it