Allylic hydrogen abstraction II. H-abstraction from 1,4 type polyalkenes as a model for free radical trapping by polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unsaturated radicals, containing different number of delocalized electrons, are formed via H-atom abstractions with CH(3), iso-C(3)H(7), OOH and OH radicals from (Z,Z) and (E,E)-hepta-2,5-dienes. These reactions and the relative stability of the different allyl-type radicals formed, were studied within the BH&HLYP method, using a 6-311+G(3df,2p) basis set, as well as within the G3MP2 level of theory on BH&HLYP/6-31G(d) geometries. The biallyl type radicals (involving 5 electrons delocalized on 5 carbon atoms) are more stable, by about 47.6 +/- 0.4 kJ mol(-1), than monoallyl type radicals (which involve 3 electrons delocalized on 3 carbon atoms). Three types of the H-atom abstractions were distinguished: direct H-abstraction with CH(3), indirect abstraction with a higher barrier height with iso-C(3)H(7), OOH and a non-direct quasi-barrierless H-abstraction with OH radicals. These observations were also confirmed by the activation entropy versus activation enthalpy as well as the Evans-Polányi's plots. The OOH-hepta-2,5-diene complexes are found to be extremely stable (from -19.6 to 22.3 kJ mol(-1)). The room temperature rate constants were calculated with transition state theory. Formations of monoallyl and biallyl radicals through H-abstraction with OH are fast; the calculated rate constants range from 5.84 x 10(-11) to 1.92 x 10(-9) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) at room temperature. These reactions may play a key role in the "very low temperature combustion" like biological oxidations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".