Fluorescent N<sup>2</sup>,N3‐ε‐Adenine Nucleoside and Nucleotide Probes: Synthesis, Spectroscopic Properties, and Biochemical Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N1,N(6)-ethenoadenine, epsilon-A, nucleos(t)ides have been previously applied as fluorescent probes in numerous biochemical systems. However, these epsilon-A analogues lack the H-bonding capability of adenine. To improve the fluorescence characteristics while preserving the H-bonding pattern required for molecular recognition, we designed a novel probe: N(2),N3-etheno-adenosine, (N(2),N3-epsilon-A). Here, we describe four novel syntheses of the target epsilon-nucleoside and related analogues. These methods are short, facile, and provide the product regiospecifically. In addition, we report the absorption and emission spectra of N(2),N3-epsilon-A and the dependence of the spectral features on the pH and polarity of the medium. Specifically, maximum emission of N(2),N3-epsilon-A in water is observed at 420 nm (phi=0.03, excitation at 290 nm). The biochemical relevance of the new probe was evaluated with respect to the P2Y(1) receptor and NTPDases 1 and 2. N(2),N3-epsilon-ATP was found to be almost equipotent with ATP at the P2Y(1) receptor and was hydrolyzed by NTPDases 1 and 2 at about 80 % of the rate of ATP. Furthermore, protein binding does not seem to shift the fluorescence of N(2),N3-epsilon-ATP. Based on the fluorescence and full recognition by ATP-binding proteins, we propose N(2),N3-epsilon-ATP and related nucleo(s)tides as unique probes for the investigation of adenine nucleo(s)tide-binding proteins as well as for other biochemical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".