Ultrafiltration Membranes Incorporating Amphiphilic Comb Copolymer Additives Prevent Irreversible Adhesion of Bacteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the resistance to bacterial adhesion of a novel polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membrane incorporating the amphiphilic comb copolymer additive, polyacrylonitrile-graft-polyethylene oxide (PAN-g-PEO). The adhesion of bacteria (E. coli K12) and the reversibility of adhered bacteria were tested with the novel membrane, and the behavior was compared to a commercial PAN ultrafiltration membrane. Under static (no flow) bacterial adhesion tests, we observed no bacterial adhesion to the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane at all ionic strengths tested, even with the addition of calcium ions. In contrast, significant adhesion of bacterial cells was observed on the commercial PAN membrane, with increased cell adhesion at higher ionic strengths and in the presence of calcium ions. Under crossflow filtration conditions, initial bacterial deposition rate increased with ionic strength and with addition of calcium ions for both membranes, with generally lower bacterial deposition rate with the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane. However, deposited bacteria were readily removed (between 97 and 100%) from the surface of the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane upon increasing the crossflow and eliminating the permeate flow (i.e., no applied transmembrane pressure), suggesting reversible adhesion of bacteria. In contrast, bacterial adhesion on the commercial PAN membrane was irreversible, with approximately 50% removal of adhered bacteria at moderate ionic strengths (10 and 30 mM) and less than 25% removal at high ionic strength (100 mM). The resistance to bacterial adhesion of the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane was further analyzed via measurement of interaction forces with atomic force microscopy (AFM). No adhesion forces were detected between a carboxylated colloid probe and the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane, while the probe exhibited strong adhesion to the commercial PAN membrane, consistent with the bacterial adhesion tests. The exceptional resistance of the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane to bacterial adhesion is attributable to steric repulsion imparted by the dense brush layer of polyethylene oxide (PEO) chains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".