MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063407263 · doi:10.1021/es902908g

Ultrafiltration Membranes Incorporating Amphiphilic Comb Copolymer Additives Prevent Irreversible Adhesion of Bacteria

2010· article· en· W2063407263 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMembraneAdhesionPolyacrylonitrileIonic strengthChemistryUltrafiltration (renal)Chemical engineeringBiophysicsMaterials scienceChromatographyBiochemistryAqueous solutionOrganic chemistryPolymerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the resistance to bacterial adhesion of a novel polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membrane incorporating the amphiphilic comb copolymer additive, polyacrylonitrile-graft-polyethylene oxide (PAN-g-PEO). The adhesion of bacteria (E. coli K12) and the reversibility of adhered bacteria were tested with the novel membrane, and the behavior was compared to a commercial PAN ultrafiltration membrane. Under static (no flow) bacterial adhesion tests, we observed no bacterial adhesion to the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane at all ionic strengths tested, even with the addition of calcium ions. In contrast, significant adhesion of bacterial cells was observed on the commercial PAN membrane, with increased cell adhesion at higher ionic strengths and in the presence of calcium ions. Under crossflow filtration conditions, initial bacterial deposition rate increased with ionic strength and with addition of calcium ions for both membranes, with generally lower bacterial deposition rate with the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane. However, deposited bacteria were readily removed (between 97 and 100%) from the surface of the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane upon increasing the crossflow and eliminating the permeate flow (i.e., no applied transmembrane pressure), suggesting reversible adhesion of bacteria. In contrast, bacterial adhesion on the commercial PAN membrane was irreversible, with approximately 50% removal of adhered bacteria at moderate ionic strengths (10 and 30 mM) and less than 25% removal at high ionic strength (100 mM). The resistance to bacterial adhesion of the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane was further analyzed via measurement of interaction forces with atomic force microscopy (AFM). No adhesion forces were detected between a carboxylated colloid probe and the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane, while the probe exhibited strong adhesion to the commercial PAN membrane, consistent with the bacterial adhesion tests. The exceptional resistance of the PAN/PAN-g-PEO membrane to bacterial adhesion is attributable to steric repulsion imparted by the dense brush layer of polyethylene oxide (PEO) chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it