Inducible expression of the heterologous PAL2 promoter from bean in white pine (Pinus strobus) transgenic cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To elucidate heterologous promoter function in gymnosperms, we introduced the bean phenylalanine ammonia-lyase-beta-glucuronidase (PAL2-GUS) gene fusion into white pine (Pinus strobus L.). Over 15 lines were produced and integration of Agrobacterium T-DNA was confirmed by Southern analysis. Induction of the reporter gene was detected in all of the lines tested following UV illumination. In contrast, a weak but constant induction was seen in only a few lines following treatment with salicylic acid (SA) or jasmonic acid (JA). However, pretreatment of suspension cultures with SA or JA enhanced the induction of PAL2-GUS expression by UV irradiation. This specific enhancement or potentiation was reduced by 50% by treating the cells with indomethacin, an inhibitor of phospholipase activity, suggesting that the observed potentiation of UV induction involves the octadecanoid pathway. The UV induction was completely abolished by treating the cells with okadaic acid, an inhibitor of phosphatase activity. Thus, the induction of the heterologous PAL2 promoter from bean is consistent with the induction of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) in angiosperms. Furthermore, our findings suggest that conifers, although phylogenetically distant to angiosperms, share some conserved promoter elements and some signal transduction mechanisms for UV-light perception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".