Structural variation in ethylenediamine and -diphosphine adducts of (2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb: a single crystal X-ray diffraction and 207Pb solid-state NMR spectroscopy study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coordination complexes of (2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb (1) with flexible bidentate ligands have been prepared to explore new bonding environments for Pb(II) thiolates. The reaction of 1 with a series of ethylenediamine and ethylenediphosphine ligands resulted in isolation of the adducts [(2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb]2(tmeda) (9), [(2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb]3(dmpe) (10) and [(2,6-Me2C6H3S)2Pb]2(dppe) (11) [tmeda = N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine; dmpe = bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane; dppe = bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane]. The X-ray crystal structure of 9 shows a dinuclear species in which tmeda is chelating a ψ-trigonal bipyramidal S2N2 Pb centre via axial and equatorial sites. The structure of 10 displays a trinuclear structural unit in which dmpe is chelating a ψ-trigonal bipyramidal S2P2 Pb centre via equatorial sites. Compounds 9 and 10 also contain a second unique metal centre with ψ-tetrahedral S3Pb bonding motifs. The structure of 11 shows the dppe ligand bridging two Pb ψ-tetrahedral S2P metal bonding environments. Static (207)Pb solid-state NMR (SSNMR) spectra of 9-11 and [Ph4As][(PhS)3Pb] (12) were acquired with cross polarization (CP)-CPMG and frequency swept pulse (WURST)-CPMG pulse sequences, and the efficiencies of these pulse sequences are compared. The (207)Pb SSNMR spectra reveal that the lead chemical shift anisotropies (CSA) vary greatly between the different Pb sites, and are generally large in magnitude. DFT calculations are utilized to relate the orientations of the (207)Pb nuclear magnetic shielding tensors to the molecular structures, and to aid in spectral assignment where multiple Pb centres are present. The combination of X-ray diffraction, (207)Pb SSNMR and DFT is shown to be invaluable for the structural characterization of these important structural motifs, and should find wide-ranging application to numerous lead coordination compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".