MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063472861 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2015.2410340

Electronic Band Structure and Material Gain of Dilute Nitride Quantum Wells Grown on InP Substrate

2015· article· en· W2063472861 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Gładysiewicz, R. Kudrawiec, Marek S. Wartak

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNarodowym Centrum NaukiNarodowe Centrum NaukiOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsPhysicsStereochemistryMaterials scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eight-band kp Hamiltonian is applied to calculate electronic band structure and material gain in dilute nitride quantum wells (QWs) grown on InP substrate. Three N-containing QW materials (GaInNAs, GaNAsSb, and GaNPSb) and different N-free barriers (GaInAs, GaAsSb, GaPSb, AlGaInAs, GaInPAs, AlGaAsSb, GaPAsSb, and AlGaPSb) lattice matched to InP are analyzed. It is shown that Ga0.17In0.83NyAs1-y-QWs with Ga0.47In0.53As, Al0.23Ga0.24In0.53As, or Ga0.17In0.83P0.63As0.37barriers are a very good gain medium for long-wavelength lasers grown on InP substrates. For N-free QWs the transverse electric (TE) mode of the material gain develops at 2.1 μm. This gain peak shifts toward longer wavelengths upon the incorporation of nitrogen and reaches the wavelength of ~2.8 Mm for 3% N. For GaNyAs0.26-ySb0.74-QWs no quantum confinement or very weak quantum confinement exist for electrons in N-free QWs with the ternary barrier (i.e., GaAs0.51Sb0.49) and quaternary (Al0.23Ga0.77As0.51Sb0.49and GaP0.25As0.15Sb0.60) barriers, respectively. However, the quantum confinement in the conduction band strongly increases after incorporation of nitrogen. For GaNyAs0.26-ySb0.74-QWs with 3% N gain peak for TE mode exists at 3.2 μm. Very similar changes in electronic band structure and material gain are noticed for GaNyP0.26-ySb0.74-QWs with GaP0.35Sb0.65, Al0.23Ga0.77As0.52Sb0.48, and GaP0.25As0.15Sb0.60barriers. In that case gain peak (TE mode) for GaN0.03P0.23Sb0.74-QW with GaP0.35Sb0.65barrier is at 3.6 μm. The intensity and the shape of material gain spectra in the three QW system vary with changes of the nitrogen concentration and the barrier content. At carrier concentration of 5 × 1018cm-3, the largest material gain exists for Ga0.17In0.83NyAs1-y-QWs with Al0.23Ga0.24In0.53As and Ga0.17In0.83As0.37Ga0.63barriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Quantum ElectronicsSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207