Successful Application of the 8-band ${\mbi{k}}{\cdot}$${\mbi{p}}$ Theory to Optical Properties of Highly Strained In(Ga)As/InGaAs Quantum Wells With Strong Conduction-Valence Band Coupling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Band-edge optical properties of highly strained In(Ga)As/InGaAs quantum wells on InP with the bandgap wavelength longer than 2 mum are analyzed by using 6- and 8-bandkmiddotptheory. It is demonstrated that the 8-band model is indispensable for the analysis of highly strained In(Ga)As/InGaAs quantum wells due to the strong coupling between conduction and valence bands induced by large strain in the well. Furthermore, an energy correction originating from the interaction between the spin-orbit coupling and the strain, which has been discarded in conventionalkmiddotptheory, is taken into account, and the role of the effect for highly strained quantum wells is discussed. The photoluminescence peak wavelength and absorption spectra of In(Ga)As/InGaAs quantum wells calculated by 8-band model are in excellent agreement with those obtained by experiment, showing the validity of the results presented here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".