MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063582896 · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-04-214593

Wild-type FOXP3 is selectively active in CD4+CD25hi regulatory T cells of healthy female carriers of different FOXP3 mutations

2009· article· en· W2063582896 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Galimberti, Laura Passerini, Alicia N. McMurchy, Udo Baron, Ivana Türbachova, Silvia Vignola, Erica Valencic, Alberto Tommasini, Anne Junker, Giantonio Cazzola, Sven Olek, Megan K. Levings, L Perroni, Maria Grazia Roncarolo, Rosa Bacchetta

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOXP3BiologyX-inactivationRegulatory T cellMutationImmunologyImmune systemCell biologyGeneticsX chromosomeMolecular biologyT cellGeneIL-2 receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) is constitutively expressed by CD4(+)CD25(hi) regulatory T cells (nTregs). Mutations of FOXP3 cause a severe autoimmune syndrome known as immune dysregulation polyendocrinopathy enteropathy X-linked, in which nTregs are absent or dysfunctional. Whether FOXP3 is essential for both differentiation and function of human nTreg cells remains to be demonstrated. Because FOXP3 is an X-linked gene subject to X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), we studied 9 healthy female carriers of FOXP3 mutations to investigate the role of wild-type (WT) versus mutated FOXP3 in different cell subsets. Analysis of active WT versus mutated (mut)-FOXP3 allele distribution revealed a random pattern of XCI in peripheral blood lymphocytes and in naive and memory CD4(+)T cells, whereas nTregs expressed only the active WT-FOXP3. These data demonstrate that expression of WT-FOXP3 is indispensable for the presence of a normal nTreg compartment and suggest that FOXP3 is not necessary for effector T-cell differentiation in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207