A Comparative Relativistic DFT and Ab Initio Study on the Structure and Thermodynamics of the Oxofluorides of Uranium(IV), (V) and (VI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All the possible uranium(VI, V, IV) oxides, fluorides and oxofluorides were studied theoretically by using density functional theory (DFT) in the generalised gradient approximation (GGA), and three different relativistic methods (all-electron scalar four component Dyall RESC method (AE), relativistic small-core ECPs, and zeroth order regular approximation ZORA). In order to test different correlation methods, for the two former relativistic methods hybrid DFT, and, for the AE method, MP2 molecular orbital calculations were performed as well. Single-point AE-CCSD(T) energies were calculated on MP2 geometries as well. Energies of the uranium(VI) and (V) oxofluorides dissociation, uranium(VI) fluoride hydrolysis and oxofluoride disproportionation were calculated and compared against the available experimental thermochemical data. AE-CCSD(T) energies were the closest to the experiment. For GGA DFT methods, all the relativistic methods used yield similar results. For thermochemistry, the best quantitative agreement with the experimental and CCSD(T) values for both U=O and U-F bond strengths was obtained with hybrid DFT methods, provided that a reliable basis set was used. Both the GGA DFT and MP2 MO methods show overbinding of these bonds; moreover, this overbinding was found to be not uniform but strongly dependent on the coordination environment of the uranium atom in each case. U=O vibrational frequencies given by hybrid DFT, however, are systematically overestimated, and are better reproduced by GGA DFT; MP2 values usually fall in-between. Reaction enthalpies, U=O frequencies and complex geometries given by the PBE, MPBE, BPBE, BLYP and OLYP GGA functionals are quite similar, with OLYP performing slightly better than the others but still not as good as hybrid DFT. The geometries of the molecules are found to be influenced by the following factors: the inverse transinfluence (ITI) of the oxygen ligand and, for U(V), and U(IV), the Jahn-Teller distortion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".