MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063731469 · doi:10.1063/1.3686547

Chemical bonding evolution towards phase transtions for nitrogen-rich high energy density solids under high pressure

2012· article· en· W2063731469 on OpenAlexaff
Anguang Hu, Fan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemical physicsNitrogenChemical bondPhase transitionPhase (matter)Diatomic moleculeChemistryMoleculeMaterials scienceThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of chemical bonding towards phase transitions under high pressure is a complex process due to the formation of unexpected intermediate states. To understand the mechanism in the transition process, first-principles simulations have been conducted on the experimentally established phase transition of polymeric nitrogen from diatomic molecules N2. The simulations reveal not only new intermediate polymeric nitrogen phase characterized as single-double bonds but also the transformation pathway towards single-bonded polymeric nitrogen. This pathway presents the highpressure- induced reaction from nitrogen single-double bond destruction to single bond formation, which is characterized by a sudden decrease of principal stress tensor components and leads to a volume collapse. On this basis, new nitrogen-rich high energy density solids, C3N12 and N2H2, are predicted together with their molecular crystal precursors and high-pressure phase transition paths for experimental syntheses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207