Fetal and Neonatal Mortality Among Twin Gestations in a Canadian Population: The Effect of Intrapair Birthweight Discordance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the association between intrapair birthweight discordance and fetal and neonatal mortality. This was a historical cohort study, using the Statistics Canada linked birth-infant death file. Twin births in Canada (excluding Ontario) for the period 1986-1997 were studied. Outcome measures were fetal and neonatal mortality. Among 59,034 twin births, 53% had 0 to 9% birthweight difference; 30% had 10 to 19% discordance; 11% had 20 to 29% discordance; and 6% had > or = 30% discordance. Maternal age, parity, sex discordance, and gestational age were important factors affecting birth weight discordance. Fetal death rates were 0.95, 1.26, 3.14, and 11.10%, respectively, in infants with a birthweight discordance of 0 to 9, 10 to 19, 20 to 29, and > or = 30%. Corresponding figures for neonatal death rates were 1.90, 2.32, 3.05, and 8.86%, respectively. Adjustment for important confounding variables including the actual birthweight and gestational age substantially reduced the birthweight discordance-related risk of fetal and neonatal mortality, but the results remained statistically significant and clinically important. The birthweight discordance-related risk of fetal and neonatal mortality was higher in smaller twins than in larger twins and higher in infants with gestational age > or = 37 weeks than those < 37 weeks. Birthweight discordance is an important risk factor for fetal and neonatal mortality, and the birthweight discordance-related risk of fetal and neonatal mortality is higher in smaller twins than in larger twins and higher in term twins than in preterm twins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".