Regulatory systems controlling motility and gene transfer agent production and release in Rhodobacter capsulatus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Production of the gene transfer agent of Rhodobacter capsulatus, RcGTA, is dependent upon several cellular regulatory systems, including a putative phosphorelay involving the CtrA and CckA proteins. These proteins are also involved in flagellar motility in R. capsulatus. The interactions of proteins in this system are best understood in Caulobacter crescentus where CtrA is activated by phosphorylation by the CckA-ChpT phosphorelay. CtrA~P activity is further controlled by SciP, which represses ctrA transcription and CtrA activation of transcription. We show that R. capsulatus chpT and cckA mutants both have greatly reduced motility and RcGTA activity. Unlike the ctrA mutant where RcGTA gene transcription is absent, the decrease in RcGTA activity is because of reduced release of RcGTA from the cells. The sciP mutant is not affected for RcGTA production but our results support the C. crescentus model of SciP repression of flagellar motility genes. We show that both unphosphorylated and phosphorylated CtrA can activate RcGTA gene expression, while CtrA~P seems to be required for release of the particle and expression of motility genes. This has led us to a new model of how this regulatory system controls motility and production of RcGTA in R. capsulatus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".