S<sup>h</sup> and S<sub>c</sub>—Two Complementary Dominant Genes that Control Self‐Compatibility in Buckwheat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fagopyrum homotropicum Ohnishi, a wild diploid (2 n = 2 x = 16) species with self‐compatibility expressed by homostylic flowers, has been used for improving cultivated buckwheat, F. esculentum Moench, a self‐incompatible diploid (2 n = 2 x = 16) species with heterostylic pin and thrum flowers. Four crosses were made between F. homotropicum and F. esculentum pin flowers, assisted by ovule rescue in vitro, to study the inheritance and interaction of the two breeding systems in the genus Fagopyrum. The presence of homostylic or pin flowers was used to determine the expression of self‐compatibility or self‐incompatibility, respectively. The segregation ratios of the F 2 progeny derived from F 1 single plants, the BC 1 F 1 generation and the F 3 progeny derived from homostylic plants were used to study the inheritance of self‐compatibility. Five F 2 populations fit a one‐gene 3:1 segregation ratio and did not fit a 9:7 ratio, while the other three F 2 populations fit a two‐gene 9:7 ratio and did not fit a 3:1 ratio. The BC 1 F 1 and F 3 progeny segregation confirmed these observations. These results support a two‐gene model with three alleles at the first locus S and two alleles at the second locus S c The proposed model has S for self‐incompatible thrum, S h for self‐compatible homostyly, and s for self‐incompatible pin, with the intrallelic interaction S > S h > s at the first locus and S c for homostyly and s c for pin (S c > s c ) at the second locus. The two complementary dominant genes S h and S c control self‐compatibility (homostyly) in F. homotropicum. The one gene or two gene segregation patterns are the result of interspecific crosses with different F. esculentum genotypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it