Clinical phenotype of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in a family with a novel <i>ZEB1</i> mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical phenotype in a family with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD) and a novel mutation in the ZEB1 gene. METHODS: Clinical examination, anterior segment photography, specular microscopy and electrophysiological investigations were performed and quantified. Genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood was sequenced for ZEB1 exons. Cosegregation of identified mutation with the disease status in the family was confirmed using polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: Ocular examination was performed on five family members from two generations. Three had anomalies of the corneal endothelium that were consistent with PPCD. Endothelial cell counts ranged from 2306 to 2987 mm(2) (ref. 2000-4000 cells/mm(2) ). No evidence of glaucoma or retinal abnormalities was observed. Extraocular abnormalities such as inguinal herniation, hydrocoele and possible bony or connective tissue anomalies were part of the disease spectrum in this family. Mutation analysis revealed a novel change in exon 5 of ZEB1 (c.672delA) that cosegregated with the affected disease status. CONCLUSION: The detailed clinical features of PPCD associated with a novel ZEB1 mutation are supportive of the previously proposed range of phenotype parameters. Further phenotype-genotype correlations may provide insights into the clinical variability and pathological processes affecting the corneal endothelium, Descemet's membrane, retinal photoreceptor function and extraocular tissues of some patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".