MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063930117 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.161

Efficient Rate Adaptation with QoS Support for Wireless Networks

2008· article· en· W2063930117 on OpenAlexaff
Khoder Shamy, Chadi Assi, Jad El‐Najjar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceComputer networkThroughputLink adaptationNetwork packetPacket lossReal-time computingIEEE 802.11FadingFrame (networking)Wireless networkBandwidth (computing)Channel (broadcasting)WirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless LANs (WLANs) suffer degrading performance when operating within domestic areas due to multiple reasons such as: multi-path, fading, path loss and user mobility. To overcome this, transmission rate is usually adjusted to a more error-resistant rate. In this paper, we first present a novel rate adaptation algorithm for IEEE 802.11 that can efficiently identify the threshold frame error rate (FER) at which link adjustment is required, based on a simple throughput analysis at the MAC layer. Then, we extend our rate adaptation algorithm to support IEEE 802.11e quality of service (QoS) requirements. When a real-time stream with QoS requirements is admitted, critical constraints such as delay bound and maximum packet drop count are integrated in the selection of the most convenient transmission rate that best respects the flow requirements. Moreover, we use dynamic bandwidth allocation rather than the default transmission opportunities (TXOPs) in a way that best offers a flow the required time for retransmissions due to packet failure based on the variant loss rate present in the channel. We validate our proposed rate adaptation algorithms via simulation results where the efficiency and effectiveness of the algorithm are noticed for both best effort and QoS flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207