Synthesis, Crystal and Electronic Structures of New Narrow-Band-Gap Semiconducting Antimonide Oxides RE<sub>3</sub>SbO<sub>3</sub>and RE<sub>8</sub>Sb<sub>3−δ</sub>O<sub>8</sub>, with RE = La, Sm, Gd, and Ho
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the search for high-temperature thermoelectric materials, two families of novel, narrow-band-gap semiconducting antimonide oxides with the compositions RE(3)SbO(3) and RE(8)Sb(3-delta)O(8) (RE = La, Sm, Gd, Ho) have been discovered. Their synthesis was motivated by attempts to open a band gap in the semimetallic RESb binaries through a chemical fusion of RESb and corresponding insulating RE(2)O(3). Temperatures of 1350 degrees C or higher are required to obtain these phases. Both RE(3)SbO(3) and RE(8)Sb(3-delta)O(8) adopt new monoclinic structures with the C2/m space group and feature similar REO frameworks composed of "RE(4)O" tetrahedral units. In both structures, the Sb atoms occupy the empty channels within the REO sublattice. High-purity bulk Sm and Ho samples were prepared and subjected to electrical resistivity measurements. Both the RE(3)SbO(3) and RE(8)Sb(3-delta)O(8) (RE = Sm, Ho) phases exhibit a semiconductor-type electrical behavior. While a small band gap in RE(3)SbO(3) results from the separation of the valence and conduction bands, a band gap in RE(8)Sb(3-delta)O(8) appears to result from the Anderson localization of electrons. The relationship among the composition, crystal structures, and electrical resistivity is analyzed using electronic structure calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".