MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064047397 · doi:10.1097/mnm.0b013e32836141a0

Intra-arterial injection of 131I-labeled Lipiodol for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2013· article· en· W2064047397 on OpenAlexaff
Alina Lintia-Gaultier, Christophe Perret, C. Ansquer, Thomas Eugène, Françoise Kraeber‐Bodéré, Éric Frampas

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Medicine Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipiodolMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsPortal vein thrombosisNuclear medicineClinical endpointLiver cancerRadiologyInternal medicineThrombosisGastroenterologyProgressive diseaseChemotherapyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Internal irradiation with iodine-131 (I)-labeled Lipiodol is one of the currently available forms of palliative therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite a cumulative experience of more than 10 years with this treatment, only a few studies have reported on its efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of intra-arterial I-labeled Lipiodol injection for treatment against advanced HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (47 men and three women; mean age 64 years) given an intra-arterial injection of I-Lipiodol (5 ml of 2.2 GBq Lipiodol labeled with I; number of mean sessions per patient, 1.3; range 1-4) were retrospectively compared with 36 patients (31 men and five women; mean age 64 years) who were given only medical support. Portal vein thrombosis was present in 86 and 100% of patients, respectively. Efficacy was determined on the basis of overall survival as the endpoint using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor response was evaluated with computed tomography according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. RESULTS: For patients treated with I-Lipiodol, median survival was 32 weeks, compared with 8 weeks for the untreated group (P=0.007). Survival at 6 months and at 1 and 2 years was 65, 35, and 22%, respectively, for patients treated with I-Lipiodol compared with 28, 8, and 0% for the untreated group. At 1 month, more than 80% of patients were responders (complete response, partial response, and stable disease) on the basis of the RECIST and EASL criteria, and at 6 months 39% were responders. No radiotoxic effect was observed, especially with respect to interstitial pneumonia. No significant difference was observed between survival and α-fetoprotein levels, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer clinical score, and portal vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial injection of I-Lipiodol is safe and provides significant survival benefit in terms of overall survival for patients with advanced HCC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Medicine CommunicationsSame topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisFrench-language works237,207