Effect of Induced Charge on Deposition of Uniformly Charged Particles in a Pediatric Oral-Extrathoracic Airway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An in vitro study was conducted in the Alberta idealized child mouth-throat, which mimics average deposition in a set of nine 6–14-year-old subjects, to examine the enhancement of deposition of monodisperse uniformly charged particles as a result of induced electrostatic forces. A purpose-based atomizer was designed and built for generating monodisperse, uniformly charged particles. The atomizer generates droplets by jet break up under the action of capillary waves and charges them via electrostatic induction. The experiments cover different particle aerodynamic diameters (d a = 3.6, 4.4, and 5.9 μm), at two flow rates (Q = 10 and 20 L/min), over a wide range of elementary charges per particle (0–10,000 e). The results show substantial increases in particle deposition in the present idealized pediatric mouth throat compared to neutral aerosols. Two empirical equations, as a function of Reynolds number, Stokes number, and induced charge number are introduced for the prediction of mouth-throat deposition in children, based on two different characteristic diameters of the airway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".