MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064143818 · doi:10.1515/jpm.2005.067

Alveolar capillary dysplasia: a six-year single center experience

2005· article· en· W2064143818 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Eulmesekian, Ernest Cutz, Boriana Parvez, Desmond Bohn, Ian Adatia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Perinatal Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaBiopsyLungDysplasiaLung biopsyDiffuse alveolar damagePathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Alveolar capillary dysplasia is a fatal disorder of the lung that requires lung biopsy for diagnosis. We reviewed the course of patients with alveolar capillary dysplasia following implementation of an early lung biopsy strategy between 1997-2002. We performed immunohisto-chemical studies on all tissue specimens. We diagnosed 7 cases of alveolar capillary dysplasia. We diagnosed 6/7 cases of alveolar capillary dysplasia pre-mortem by early lung biopsy. Median time between admission and lung biopsy was 6.5 days. All patients survived lung biopsy but died following withdrawal of active therapy after confirmation of the tissue diagnosis. In 1 patient we demonstrated histological findings of alveolar capillary dysplasia and congenital acinar dysplasia. Two patients were first cousins. One patient underwent pulmonary angiography with rapid filling of the pulmonary veins before passage of contrast through the capillary bed. Five patients were supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and 2/5 patients survived decannulation. During the same period 8 patients required ECMO for acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Four out of 8 were diagnosed with alveolar capillary dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Early lung biopsy was performed with low risk and high diagnostic yield for alveolar capillary dysplasia. Alveolar capillary dysplasia occurs frequently in neonates who require ECMO support for refractory pulmonary hypertension. We have added an additional familial case and suggest a novel angiographic finding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Perinatal MedicineSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207