Feasibility of outpatient consolidation chemotherapy in older versus younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intensive consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in complete remission is being increasingly administered on an outpatient basis. Although this approach has been found to be safe and feasible in younger patients, its safety in older patients remains unknown. We therefore undertook an evaluation of outpatient-based consolidation chemotherapy in older AML patients, and compared results to younger patients treated at the same institution over the same time period. The overall rate of readmission was ~50%, mostly for infections, with mean admission duration of 2 weeks. The overall mortality rate was 2.2%. Readmission rates and duration of readmission were somewhat higher in older patients, but infection rate, intensive care (ICU) admissions, and mortality rates were comparable to those in the younger patient cohort. However, we also observed that rates of febrile neutropenia, bacteremia, ICU admission, and death were significantly higher during the second consolidation, as compared with the first, in both younger and older patients. We conclude that outpatient-based consolidation therapy can be safely undertaken in a substantial proportion of fit older patients with AML.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".