The Leeuwin Current, eddies and sub-Antarctic waters off south-western Australia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data from a research vessel cruise in late 1994 and several years of satellite observations revealed complex interactions of ocean features off south-western Australia. The ship measurements showed that the Leeuwin Current (LC) commonly ran at 0.5 m s–1 above the upper continental slope and extended down to approximately 250 m. South of the continent, a 200-km diameter anticyclonic eddy depressed the ocean structure in the upper 1000 m. The eddy showed influences of the LC, deep mixing in winter and summer heating. The sub-Antarctic water around the eddy was cooler, fresher and richer in nutrients and oxygen than both the eddy and the LC. Satellite thermal and topographic measurements showed that cyclonic eddies accelerated the LC along the southern upper continental slope, whereas anticyclonic eddies diverted it out to sea and then back again. The images suggested that weak eddies originating east of the Great Australian Bight migrate westward, first encountering the continental slope off the Recherche Archipelago. There, the anticyclonic eddies take on warm water from the LC and strengthen. Several anticyclonic eddies were followed westward beyond the archipelago for 18 months as they drifted at up to 5 km day–1 and interacted with the LC and with one another.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".