MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064211345 · doi:10.1139/v05-116

The remarkable effect of 7-amino substituents on the reactivity of 4-nitrobenzofurazans with nucleophiles

2005· article· en· W2064211345 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael R. Crampton, Chukwuemeka Isanbor, Thomas C Willett

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryReactivity (psychology)NucleophileSulfiteAdductMedicinal chemistryIminiumHydroxideNucleophilic substitutionYield (engineering)Nucleophilic additionIonStereochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reactions of four 4-nitrobenzofurazans (4a–4d) substituted at the 7 position with (a) N-ethyl, (b) N-butyl, (c) piperidino, or (d) pyrrolidino groups have been examined with sulfite ions and with hydroxide ions in water–DMSO (80:20, v/v). Addition of sulfite at the 5 position gives σ adducts with equilibrium constants ca. 105 lower than that for the formation of the corresponding adduct from 4-nitrobenzofurazan. These reductions are attributed to the stabilization of the parent molecules 4a–4d by conjugative interaction between the 4 and 7 substituents. In alkaline solution, 4a and 4b yield the conjugate bases while 4c and 4d suffer nucleophilic substitution to give 7-hydroxy-4-nitrobenzofurazan. Reactivity here is relatively high because of the iminium ion character of the substrates. Key words: benzofurazans, σ adducts, nucleophilic reactivity, substitution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207