The Moderating Role of Attachment Styles on the Relationship between Alexithymia and Interpersonal Problems in an Iranian Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The moderating role of attachment styles on the relationship between alexithymia and interpersonal problemswas assessed in the present study. Eight hundred and twenty nine Iranian general populations (372 men, 457women) who were living in Tehran were involved in this study. The participants were asked to complete threequestionnaires including Adult Attachment Inventory, Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, and Inventory ofInterpersonal Problems. Results showed a significant negative correlation between secure attachment style andinterpersonal problems. Moreover, the results revealed that avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles as well asalexithymia had a significant positive correlation with interpersonal problems. Regression analysis indicated thatattachment styles have a moderating role on the relationship between alexithymia and interpersonal problems. Itcan be concluded that the relationship between alexithymia and interpersonal problems is not a simple linear one.This is partly moderated by attachment styles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".