Copy number variant study of bipolar disorder in Canadian and UK populations implicates synaptic genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 936 bipolar disorder (BD) individuals and 940 psychiatrically healthy comparison individuals of North European descent were analyzed for copy number variation (CNV). Using multiple CNV calling algorithms, and validating using in vitro molecular analyses, we identified CNVs implicating several candidate genes that encode synaptic proteins, such as DLG1, DLG2, DPP6, NRXN1, NRXN2, NRXN3, SHANK2, and EPHA5, as well as the neuronal splicing regulator RBFOX1 (A2BP1), and neuronal cell adhesion molecule CHL1. We have also identified recurrent CNVs on 15q13.3 and 16p11.2-regions previously reported as risk loci for neuropsychiatric disorders. In addition, we performed CNV analysis of individuals from 215 BD trios and identified de novo CNVs involving the NRXN1 and DRD5 genes. Our study provides further evidence of the occasional involvement of genomic mutations in the etiology of BD, however, there is no evidence of an increased burden of CNVs in BD. Further, the identification of CNVs at multiple members of the neurexin gene family in BD individuals, supports the role of synaptic disruption in the etiology of BD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".