MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2064370853 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.1652

P4–259: White matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer's disease: The potential protective role of vitamin D

2013· article· en· W2064370853 on OpenAlexaff
Cédric Annweiler, Manuel Montero‐Odasso, Robert Bartha, Olivier Beauchet

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperintensityInternal medicineVitamin D and neurologyMedicineGastroenterologyLeukoaraiosisConfoundingBody mass indexCardiologyWhite matterPsychologyEndocrinologyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitamin D insufficiency is very common among Alzheimer's patients, with a prevalence ranging between 70–90%. Although anti-ischemic effects have been reported in rodents supplemented with vitamin D, the impact of higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations on leukoaraiosis has not been studied yet in humans. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine whether higher 25OHD concentrations were associated among older adults with fewer white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). One hundred and ten Caucasian community-dwellers with subjective memory complaint (mean age 71.9 ± 5.9 years; 47.3% female) from the GAIT study, were divided into 2 groups according to serum 25OHD concentration (either insufficiency ≤75nmol/L, or normal status >75nmol/L). The total extent of periventricular and subcortical white matter signal-intensity abnormality was measured using Manolio's semiquantitative visual rating scale applied to T2-weighted FLAIR magnetic resonance images. Periventricular and subcortical WMHs were then characterized separately using Fazeka's scale. A ge, gender, body mass index, education level, Mini-Mental State Examination score, serum concentrations of calcium, TSH, vitamin B12, and the effect of season tested were considered as potential confounders. Compared to participants with 25OHD insufficiency (n=85), participants with normal 25OHD status (n=25) had a lower grade of periventricular WMHs (1.34±0.66 versus 1.04 ±0.61 respectively, P=0.045). Increased serum 25OHD concentration was associated with a decrease in total WMHs grade (fully adjusted beta =-0.34 [95CI: -0.65;-0.02] with P=0.037), specifically a decrease in periventricular WMHs (fully adjusted beta =-0.12 [95CI: -0.24;-0.01] with P=0.040), but not in subcortical WMHs (fully adjusted beta =-0.11 [95CI: -0.26;0.05] with P=0.175). Higher s erum 25OHD concentration was associated with a decreased amount of WMHs, especially periventricular WMHs, in the studied cohort of community-dwelling older adults with subjective memory complaint. Continued work is needed toward understanding the role of vitamin D in brain and the impact of vitamin D insufficiency in the course of Alzheimer's disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicVitamin D Research Studies→French-language works237,207→