MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064483148 · doi:10.1080/014850190512770

Sperm Dna Integrity: Correlation With Sperm Plasma Membrane Integrity In Semen Evaluated For Male Infertility

2005· article· en· W2064483148 on OpenAlexaff
Sergey I. Moskovtsev, John Willis, A. Azad, J. Brendan M. Mullen

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Andrology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemenAndrologySpermDNA fragmentationInfertilityMembrane integrityBiologyHuman fertilizationFertilitySemen analysisMale infertilityMedicineMembraneAnatomyGeneticsPregnancyApoptosisPopulationProgrammed cell death

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous independent studies have indicated that abnormally low parameters of sperm DNA integrity and sperm membrane integrity correlate to reduced fertility due in part to implantation disorders. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the relationship between sperm plasma membrane functional integrity assessed by the hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) and sperm DNA integriy test assesed by DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Semen samples from 102 random patients were evaluated in terms of standard semen parameters and assessed by DFI and HOST. Both tests showed a significant correlation to standard semen parameters (p < .05). In addition, patients with abnormal HOST results had a higher likehood of a subnormal or abnormal DFI result (p < .001). Our results suggest that a common sublethal insult may manifest as abnormalities in both the nucleus and the plasma membrane that act at the implantation and/or subsequent levels of development rather than at the fertilization stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of AndrologySame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207