MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064600453 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.106

Research agenda for preterm birth: Recommendations from the March of Dimes

2005· article· en· W2064600453 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy Green, Karla Damus, Joe Leigh Simpson, Jay D. Iams, E. Albert Reece, Calvin J. Hobel, Irwin R. Merkatz, Michael F. Greene, Richard H. Schwarz

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
FundersMarch of Dimes Foundation
KeywordsMedicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.092
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.182
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0920.182
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.011
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0220.022
Open science0.0100.022
Research integrity0.1090.069
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations208
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207