MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064652673 · doi:10.1097/cad.0b013e32831c14ec

Interactions of doxycycline with chemotherapeutic agents in human breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cells

2009· article· en· W2064652673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnti-Cancer Drugs · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityJuravinski Cancer Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDoxycyclineCancer researchInternal medicineAdenocarcinomaHuman breastMedicineOncologyBreast cancerBiologyAntibioticsCancerMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commonly used chemotherapeutic agents for breast cancer treatment include cisplatin, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel. Unfortunately, these effective antiproliferative agents are limited by their toxicities. Previously, we have shown that doxycycline can substantially reduce tumor burden in an animal model of breast cancer bone metastasis. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of doxycycline in combination with chemotherapy. Human breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cells were treated in vitro with each drug individually and in combination with doxycycline. Cell survival was determined using the clonogenic survival assay. Doxycycline in combination with doxorubicin or paclitaxel yielded therapeutic antagonism at all effect levels. Combinatory treatment with cisplatin, however, yielded a biphasic interaction, at low combinatorial doses, the effect was quantified as nearly additive, whereas higher doxycycline-cisplatin doses yielding greater than 50% cell inhibition resulted in synergistic effects. Cell cycle profiles were determined and showed that treatment with doxycycline, cisplatin, and doxorubicin resulted in G1-phase, S-phase, and G2/M-phase arrests, respectively. Upon addition of doxycycline to doxorubicin, the G2/M-arrest characteristic of doxorubicin-only treatment was abrogated, which may account for the observed antagonism. Cells treated with doxycycline and cisplatin showed a further increase in S-phase arrest, also observed with cisplatin alone, which may be responsible for the additive and synergistic effects on cell survival. We clearly show that doxycycline in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin treatment resulted in antagonism; however, combining doxycycline with cisplatin led to synergistic interactions at higher effect levels. The increased potency of cisplatin may warrant dose reduction and thus decrease toxicity in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it