Does a warmer lake mean smaller benthic algae? Evidence against the importance of temperature–size relationships in natural systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ectotherms decrease in size with increasing ambient temperature. Temperature–size relationships (TSR) have been observed experimentally in a wide range of animals, algae, protozoans and bacteria. However, it is still unclear whether temperature is an important factor controlling the size of organisms in natural populations. In this study, we used natural variability in water temperature in the nearshore areas of a single lake to test TSR in populations of benthic diatoms. We deployed standard tile substrates at 5 m depth (similar light availability) at cold and warm sites that were exposed to different hydrodynamic forces. We compared cell sizes of three species of diatoms ( Achnanthidium minutissimum, Gomphonema acuminatum and Gyrosigma acuminatum ) at these sites. Counter to the TSR, diatom cells at warm sites were either larger ( Achnanthidium, Gomphonema ) or similar in size ( Gyrosigma ) compared to those at colder sites. Diatom size was also related to site exposure (hydrodynamic forces), but differently for species with different architectures. TSR were not detectable in the field for these three species of benthic diatom, even when tested within a single ecosystem at a given time of the year. The size of benthic diatoms, however, varied in a predictable way between sites, and such differences could affect the functioning of these primary producers in different parts of the littoral zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".