MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064705097 · doi:10.1002/apj.193

Ethanol‐tolerant Pt‐alloy cathodes for direct ethanol fuel cell (DEFC) applications

2008· article· en· W2064705097 on OpenAlexafffund
F.J. Rodríguez‐Varela, O. Savadogo

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsDirect-ethanol fuel cellCathodeElectrochemistryAlloyEthanolChemistryCatalysisAlcohol fuelOxygenEthanol fuelAlcoholCurrent densityChemical engineeringMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryMetallurgyProton exchange membrane fuel cellElectrodePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The electroactivity of Pt1Co1(a/o)/C and Pt3Cr1(a/o)/C for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in ethanol‐containing medium was studied. It was found that these cathodes present a high tolerance to this alcohol. The onset potential of the ORR decreased at 14 and 12 mV in the presence of 0.5 M ethanol on Pt1Co1/C and Pt3Cr1/C, respectively. The tolerance of the Pt alloys is one order of magnitude higher than that shown by Pt‐alone catalysts in previous works. Exceptionally, the Pt1Co1/C alloy maintained a very important electrocatalytic activity, i.e. a very small variation in current density at 400 mV in electrochemical cell measurements and improved performances in a direct ethanol fuel cell (DEFC). The current densities obtained from the DEFC equipped with a 10% Pt1Co1/C cathode were similar to those obtained when 20% Pt3Cr1/C was used. However, a higher performance in terms of Pt content was shown by PtCo/C. These electrochemical characteristics indicate the advantage of using PtCo alloys as cathodes in DEFCs. Copyright © 2008 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsia-Pacific Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207