MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064706883 · doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.037

Modeling Groundwater-Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Exchanges in Fractured Porous Media

2013· article· en· W2064706883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Environmental Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaGlobal Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsGroundwater rechargeMacroporeGeologyGroundwaterEvapotranspirationHydraulic conductivityVadose zoneEnvironmental scienceAtmosphere (unit)Hydrology (agriculture)Soil scienceGeomorphologyAquiferSoil waterGeotechnical engineeringEcologyMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Models for the soil-plant-atmosphere system, especially large scale models, frequently ignore interactions with underlying groundwater, and ignore fractures or macropores which may strongly influence the system response. Unsaturated fractured porous media can exhibit a range of behavior, depending on both the characteristics of the porous matrix and the fractures, and the climatic conditions to which they are subject. A dominant characteristic in surficial fractured porous geological formations is the vertical distribution of fractures in the near surface region. This paper explores how these different modes of behavior operate at various field sites and under different climatic conditions. Two diverse fractured porous settings are considered: fractured glacial till of the semi-arid, seasonally frozen Canadian prairies and the Chalk in humid, temperate south east England. Interpretations from hypothetical hillslope scale model simulations provide insights into how the properties of the material, and in particular the distribution of the fractures and the matrix hydraulic conductivity, affect the spatial distribution of evapotranspiration and the timing, magnitude and spatial distribution of groundwater recharge. Such behavior is not captured in conventional large scale models which consider only a shallow, one-dimensional soil moisture balance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it