MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064732208 · doi:10.1089/lap.2012.0346

Technique for Salvage ERCP with Gastric Bypass Anatomy and Severe Intra-abdominal Adhesions

2013· article· en· W2064732208 on OpenAlexaff
Guillaume Martel, Ramy Abaskharoun, Stephen E. Ryan, Joseph Mamazza, R Fairfull-Smith, Fady Balaa, Richard Mimeault

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographySurgeryBalloonGastric bypassEndoscopyLaparoscopyBalloon dilationBiliary tractStomachGastrostomyInternal medicineWeight loss

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis is a complex problem in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy. Several techniques of biliary clearance have been described, but these can be limited by intra-abdominal adhesions. PATIENT AND METHODS: A 36-French surgical gastrostomy was created and was allowed to mature for 10 weeks. It was exchanged for a 15-mm laparoscopic surgery trocar under fluoroscopic guidance. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was carried out using the trocar as a stable access point. Complete biliary clearance was achieved in one sitting using sphincterotomy, large-diameter biliary orifice balloon dilation, and balloon/basket sweeps. RESULTS: Total endoscopy time was 120 minutes. There were no complications associated with the procedure. The postprocedure length of stay was 2 days. The total bilirubin level at discharge was 1.2 mg/dL (20 μmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with gastric bypass anatomy and severe adhesions, successful salvage therapeutic ERCP can be achieved using a gastrostomy tract and a large-bore laparoscopy trocar for access to the defunctioned stomach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesSame topicMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesFrench-language works237,207