Autoradiographic analysis of rat brain kinin B<sub>1</sub> and B<sub>2</sub> receptors: Normal distribution and alterations induced by epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kindling-induced seizures constitute an experimental model of human temporal lobe epilepsy that is associated with changes in the expression of several inflammatory proteins and/or their receptors in distinct brain regions. In the present study, alterations of kinin receptors in the brain of amygdaloid-kindled rats were assessed by means of in vitro autoradiography, using (125)I-labeled 3-4 hydroxyphenyl-propionyl-desArg(9)-D-Arg degrees -[Hyp(3), Thi(5), D-Tic(7), Oic(8)]-bradykinin (B(1) receptors) and (125)I-labeled 3-4 hydroxyphenyl-propionyl-D-Arg degrees -[Hyp(3), Thi(5), D-Tic(7), Oic(8)]-bradykinin (B(2) receptors) as ligands. Results demonstrate that B(2) receptors are widely distributed throughout the brain of control rats. The highest densities were observed in lateral septal nucleus, median preoptic nucleus, dentate gyrus, amygdala, spinal trigeminal nucleus, mediovestibular nucleus, inferior cerebellar peduncles, and in most of cortical regions (0.81-1.4 fmol/mg tissue). In contrast, very low densities of B(1) receptors were detected in all analyzed areas from control rats (0.18-0.26 fmol/mg tissue). When assessed in kindled rats, specific binding sites for B(2) receptors were significantly decreased (41 to 76%) in various brain areas. Conversely, B(1) receptor binding sites were markedly increased in kindled rats, especially in hippocampus (CA2 congruent with CA1 congruent with CA3), Amy and entorhinal, peririnal/piriform, and occipital cortices (152-258%). Data show for the first time that kindling-induced epilepsy results in a significant decline of B(2) receptor binding sites, accompanied by a striking increase of B(1) receptor labeling in the rat brain. An altered balance between B(1) and B(2) receptor populations may play a pivotal role in the onset and/or maintenance of epilepsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".