Residual Anxiety Symptoms in Depressed Primary Care Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to characterize the burden of anxiety among residual depressive symptoms in naturalistic primary care settings. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a database comprised of naturalistically treated depressed patients across Canada was done. This bilingual (English and French), multi-center, randomized validation study was conducted in 47 primary care settings in four provinces of Canada. Patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text-Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for a major depressive episode, in the context of a major depressive disorder (N=454) were enrolled. Eligible patients received open-label, flexible-dose antidepressant treatment. The analysis reported here was limited to patients whose depression severity was evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) (n=205). Patients completing 8 weeks of open-label antidepressant treatment (n=157) were considered evaluable. As a proxy for anxiety symptoms, scores on 6 items from the HAMD-17 (psychological anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal distress, fatigue, hypochondriasis, and insight into illness) were summed to arrive at a composite anxiety score, which was then used to calculate an anxiety ratio (with the composite anxiety score as the numerator and the total HAMD-17 score as the denominator). RESULTS: The composite anxiety ratio at baseline did not correlate with the probability of remitting at endpoint (p=0.534). After 8 weeks of antidepressant therapy, remitting patients evinced a statistically significant decrease in anxiety ratio (p=0.041). Moreover, an inverse correlation was noted between severity of anxious symptoms at endpoint and probability of remission (p=0.026). The burden of anxiety, presented as the anxiety ratio, was higher in non-remitting patients at endpoint (p=0.828). CONCLUSION: Residual depressive symptoms represent ongoing illness activity in depression. Sharpening the focus of therapeutic interventions in the clinical environment calls for tracking and managing residual anxiety symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".