Outpatient pediatric renal transplant biopsy – Is it safe?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The safe observation time following pediatric renal transplant biopsy is unknown. To predict the safety of day-care pediatric renal transplant biopsy, we retrospectively evaluated the timing, incidence and severity of post-biopsy complications in children observed overnight. Biopsies were performed under real time ultrasound guidance using an 18-gauge Bard Biopty needle. Coagulation screen and platelet counts were measured preprocedure. Hemoglobin (Hb) was measured preprocedure, at 6 h and at 1-day post-procedure. Twenty-eight of 45 children transplanted between January 2002 and May 2004 underwent 65 biopsies. There was gross hematuria following 8 (12%) biopsies; 2/8 occurred after 6 h. Hb fell by >15 g/L in six cases (9%) - three had Hb drop within 6 h post-procedure and three had a steady decline over 24 h. No patient required blood transfusion. Oral analgesia post-procedure was required in seven cases (11%). One of these had gross hematuria. No patient required surgical intervention or transfusion. Three complications were recorded >6 h post-biopsy but none required intervention. Daycare renal transplant biopsy appears to be safe in selected patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".