MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064869484 · doi:10.1038/sj.clpt.6100443

Emergency Contraception Update: A Canadian Perspective

2007· article· en· W2064869484 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Vivian Leung, Judith A. Soon, Marc Levine

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaMinistry of Health, British Columbia
KeywordsEmergency contraceptionLevonorgestrelMedicineFood and drug administrationPharmacyMedical prescriptionFamily medicineFamily planningOver-the-counterEnvironmental healthPopulationNursingResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barriers to hormonal emergency contraceptive (EC) access in Canada and the United States led professional and lay groups to lobby for levonorgestrel (LNG) (PLAN B, Barr Pharmaceuticals, Pomona, New York) to be made available over-the-counter. In December 2000, British Columbia, Canada, granted EC prescriptive authority to pharmacists, followed by Quebec in December 2001 and Saskatchewan in September 2003. In April 2005, Health Canada placed LNG on non-prescription, behind-the-pharmacy-counter status with no age restriction. After much controversy, in August 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved over-the-counter access to LNG by adults in the United States. Results of our experience in Canada and recent information regarding mechanisms of action, effectiveness, adverse effects, and the effect of increased availability on reproductive health outcomes are presented here to help inform clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207