MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064927794 · doi:10.1097/coc.0b013e3181beac33

A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial of Lapatinib (GW572016) in Hormonally Untreated Advanced Prostate Cancer

2010· article· en· W2064927794 on OpenAlexaff
Srikala S. Sridhar, Sebastién J. Hotte, Joseph L. Chin, Gary R. Hudes, Richard Gregg, John Trachtenberg, Lisa Wang, Danh Tran‐Thanh, Nhu‐An Pham, Ming‐Sound Tsao, David W. Hedley, Janet Dancey, Malcolm J. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsJuravinski Cancer Centre
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsLapatinibMedicineInternal medicineProstate cancerRashOncologyClinical endpointCancerProstate-specific antigenBreast cancerPopulationPhases of clinical researchAdverse effectClinical trialTrastuzumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Lapatinib (GW572016) is a selective and potent dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor 1 (EGFR) and 2 (HER2), approved in the treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer. Since EGFR and HER2 overexpression has also been seen in prostate cancer and appears to correlate with a worse clinical outcome, Lapatinib may represent a novel therapeutic strategy in prostate cancer. This Phase II multicenter clinical trial is the first to evaluate Lapatinib in early stage, hormonally untreated recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients received lapatinib 1500 mg PO daily until progression. The primary end point was prostate specific antigen (PSA) response. Archival tumor tissue was collected for EGFR and HER2 analysis. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients, median age 67, ECOG PS 0-2, mean baseline PSA 7.5, were evaluable for response. In total, 125 cycles were administered. The most frequent adverse events were lymphopenia, fatigue, rash, dyspepsia, and diarrhea. Grade 3+ increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was reported in 2 patients, and grade 4 blurry vision in 1 patient. No PSA responses were seen. Median time to progression (TTP) was 4.6 months and 6 months progression-free estimate was 44.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Lapatinib was well tolerated but like other EGFR- and HER2-targeted agents in advanced HRPC failed to show significant antitumor activity even in this very early stage hormonally untreated population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.457 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207