Erect and Supine Radiographs to Assess Effectiveness of SWL for Stones in a Caliceal Diverticulum or Dilated Calix
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are patients who have been treated with shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for stones in a caliceal diverticulum (CD) or a dilated calix in whom the degree of fragmentation is difficult to assess. The aim of this study was to see if adequate fragmentation could be confirmed by the demonstration of layering of fine fragments on an erect radiograph. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a period of 9 months, 13 patients with stones in a CD or a dilated calix with a stenosed infundibulum were studied 2 weeks after SWL with erect and supine radiographs. RESULTS: One of eight patients with a CD cleared all fragments. Two patients showed no change in the appearance of the stone on either the supine or the erect film, and of the remaining five patients, three demonstrated layering of sand at the base of the CD. Five patients with a dilated calix and a narrow infundibulum were also studied: two of these patients became stone free, two demonstrated complete fragmentation with layering of the sand, and in one patient, a 4-mm fragment, hidden within the sand, was revealed only on the erect film. CONCLUSION: There are patients who have been treated with SWL for stones in a CD or a dilated calix in whom adequate fragmentation is difficult to demonstrate. An erect radiograph in these patients may demonstrate layering of the fragments to confirm fragmentation and obviate repeat SWL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".