MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064960121 · doi:10.3166/acsm.33.123-134

Effects of Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup> AND SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> ions on the precipitation kinetics and microstructure of aragonite

2008· article· fr· W2064960121 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Héla Karoui, Atef Korchef, Mohamed Tlili, Henda Mosrati, Otávio Gil, Ridha Mosrati, Mohamed Ben Amor

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationIonAragoniteChemical kineticsKineticsMicrostructureNuclear reactionRadiochemistryMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryMineralogyCrystallographyPhysicsAtomic physicsCalcite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La diffraction des rayons X, la spectroscopie Raman et l'analyse par spectroscopie d'emission optique ont ete utilisees pour etudier l'effet des ions magnesium, calcium et sulfate sur la cinetique de precipitation et la microstructure du carbonate de calcium forme, par la methode de degazage controle, a partir des solutions synthetiques equivalentes a l'eau de mer standard. Pour toutes les experiences, la phase aragonite a ete obtenue. La presence des ions Mg 2+ et SO 4 2- dans la solution augmente le temps de germination et diminue la vitesse de croissance de l'aragonite. Les ions magnesium ont ete inseres dans la structure cristalline de l'aragonite en substituant les ions calcium. Cette substitution depend de la concentration des ions Mg2 + , Ca 2+ et SO 4 2- . L'augmentation de la concentration du calcium mene a un faible taux d'incorporation de Mg 2+ . Les ions sulfates peuvent etre adsorbes sur les surfaces de l'aragonite ou inhibent la substitution du calcium par le magnesium, suivant les concentrations ajoutees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207