Active Site Residues of <i>cis</i>-2,3-Dihydro-2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl Dehydrogenase from <i>Comamonas testosteroni</i> Strain B-356
Bibliographic record
Abstract
cis-2,3-dihydro-2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl dehydrogenase (BphB) from Comamonas testosteroni strain B-356 is the second enzyme of the biphenyl/polychlorinated biphenyl degradation pathway. Based on the crystal structure of a related BphB, three conserved residues, Ser142, Tyr155, and Lys159, have been suggested to function as a "catalytic triad" as for other members of the short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) family. In this study, substitution of each triad residue was examined in BphB. At pH 9.0, turnover numbers relative to wild-type enzyme were as follows: Y155F, 0.1%; S142A, 1%; and K159A, 10%. Although the Michaelis constants of K159A and S142A for cis-2,3-dihydro-2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl increased about 20-fold, relatively little change was observed in the K(m) for dinucleotide. The K159A mutant, which showed little dehydrogenase activity at pH 7, was sharply activated by increasing the pH, reaching almost 25% of the activity of the wild-type enzyme at pH 9. 8. These three residues are therefore critical for BphB activity, as suggested by the crystal structure and similarity to other SDR family members. In addition, BphB showed a strong preference for NAD(+) over NADP(+), with a 260-fold higher specificity constant (k(cat)/K(m)). Evidence is presented that the inefficient use of NADP(+) by BphB might partly be due to the presence of an aspartate residue at position 36.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".