Quand une structure particulière de l’ARN du VIH-1 conduit à un décalage de phase : perspectives pour le traitement de l’infection par le VIH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ribosomal frameshift is used by HIV-1 to synthesize the precursor of its enzymes. The frameshift stimulator is a peculiar structure in the viral messenger RNA coding for this precursor, which increases the probability that this frameshift occurs. It was proposed to be either a triplex structure or an irregular stem-loop. Recently, two NMR groups independently showed that the frameshift stimulatory signal of HIV-1 is an extended stem-loop, with an internal three-purine bulge separating two helical regions. However, it remains unclear how such a structure promotes frameshifting. It is proposed that frameshifting results from a specific interaction between the stimulatory signal and either a hypothetical protein factor or the ribosome. The characterization of the structure of the frameshift stimulatory signal paves the way to the rational design of novel antiviral drugs, which, by binding to this signal, could interfere with frameshifting and viral replication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".