SP37 Self-Management Support in a Women-Only Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Are we Empowering our Patients?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Self-management approaches have been shown to have positive impacts on the wellbeing of individuals with chronic illness. Support is critical to the development of self-management and emphasizes the patients' central role in managing and being responsible for their health. Women with cardiovascular disease typically have more than one chronic illness and may be helped by a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program that provides self-management support. It is unknown whether programs specifically developed on the principals of empowerment for women meet the self-management support needs of female cardiac patients. Objective: The objective of this qualitative study was to determine whether, from the perspective of participants in a women-only CR program, the program provided the education, problem-solving skills and support necessary to manage their health problems. Methods: Fourteen women previously enrolled in a women-only CR or primary prevention program participated in a one-time, in-person, semi-structured qualitative interview. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a constant comparative approach to develop a coding scheme and identify relevant themes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".